Subjective Morality & Objective Morality

I

The world we are in is an inverted corruption of the world we are from.

In the world we live in:

• Our free will is inhibited

• Morality is subjective

• There is suffering

Our free will is inhibited by our brain, our body and the physical universe.  Our consciousness has literally been imprisoned in the cells of our body.  Contrary to what they want everyone to believe, consciousness is not an emergent property of the brain.  The brain is inhibiting our consciousness and  programming into us the belief systems that this world encourages.  Our thoughts are somewhat uninhibited and free, but the potential to act upon these thoughts is quite limited.  One thing that I do believe is that if I can understand a concept, then it is possible for that concept to exist. If you can understand these concepts, then it is possible that these concepts do exist; they just don't exist here, in this reality.

My understanding is that, in this world, morality is subjective.  There is no action that we can claim is always morally wrong and there is no action that we can claim is always morally correct.  The intention behind every action must be known to determine if the action was the morally correct action to take. The subjective nature of morality on this planet encourages conflict.  For example, one individual feels that the action taken was the right thing to do, while a second individual feels that the very same action was the wrong thing to do.  Moral disputes necessitate the existence of an authority figure, to resolve the conflict by making the final determination for whether the action was right or wrong. 

In the world we are from:

• Free will is uninhibited

• Morality is objective

• There is no suffering

This is the world that I know is out there somewhere. This world is my home and it might be your home, too. If we are able to understand the concepts that make this world possible, then it has the potential to truly exist. I am able to understand that authentic free will is uninhibited.  Free beings living in this world exist in the form of pure conscious awareness that is not bound by universal laws. The true God of creation (who is not affiliated with any religion practiced on Earth) is pure, unconditional love.  The gift of the true God of creation is authentic, uninhibited free will. 

In what kind of world would it even be possible to experience such love and freedom?  In a world where morality is objective.  Objective morality is The Divine Law of The True God of Creation: It is wrong to take authority over others, and it is wrong to allow others to take authority over you.  The understanding of objective morality is knowledge that is needed to get off the wheel of Samsara and exit the reincarnation cycle.  We are reincarnated when we follow Earthbound belief systems that indoctrinate us into believing that we must allow others to take authority over us. 

The world where the True God of Creation resides is a world where no one takes authority over others or allows others to take authority over them because morality is objective and based on the action itself; therefore, taking authority over others is always wrong, regardless of the specific circumstances of each incident.  When no one is taking authority over others then everyone is truly free, and  there is no suffering. 

II

The reason why there is suffering is because we are in a world where it is ok to take authority over others. This is why the world is in a fallen state and this is why we are all separated from the True God of creation.  The True God literally cannot exist within a world that violates the divine law.

Adam and Eve has always been my favorite story in the Bible because, every time I go back to it, I always seem to uncover some deeper meaning behind it.  I realize now that the story is also inverted (which so many things in this world are).  According to the story, the world is fallen because Adam and Eve disobeyed god and ate the forbidden fruit, when in fact, the opposite is true: the world is fallen because god is taking authority over Adam and Eve, who are, in turn, allowing god to do so.

In this world, the divine law is broken and it is ok to take authority over others.  This is an aspect of nature, and is commonplace in the animal kingdom.  We live in a world where things need to eat other things to survive, as parasites find hosts to feed off of, while natural disasters decimate the land.

A great example of the corrupted paradox this world manifests, which is relevant in today's society, is abortion.  Abortion is wrong, because when a woman has an abortion she is taking authority over the life of the baby, but if we were to make abortion unavailable altogether, we would be taking authority over the life of the woman, which is also wrong.  Politicized issues, such as abortion, are what I call "duality traps". where everyone is encouraged to pick a side in the debate and to not deviate from the opinions of their chosen side.  The problem is that both sides of the debate are breaking the divine law, which means everyone involved is supporting a morally wrong belief.  Understand that you do not have to play into these traps and that you aren't required to have an opinion on these issues.  Avoid the duality trap by being neutral on the issue and not choosing either side.

Because the nature of this planet is against divine law (aka objective morality), authoritative hierarchy systems are naturally occurring formations.  Authoritative hierarchy systems, such as governments,  hold authority over human populations across the world.  Using the Hegelian Dialectic, governments create fear and then offer protection and security, in order to alleviate said fear.  Humanity responds to the fear by giving their consent for the government to take authority over them.  Our current example of this is the COVID-19 pandemic, which has some folks in such a state of fear that they are currently begging the government to hold more authority over them.  

An example of the divine law being inverted is found in the sworn oath of every law enforcement officer in America: "to serve and protect".  "To serve" represents the police allowing citizens to take authority over them "and protect" represents citizens allowing the police to have authority over them.

From the time we are born into this corrupt and inverted world, we are relentlessly indoctrinated with the belief that it is ok for us to take authority over others and it is ok for others to take authority over us. We are raised under the authority of our parents, educated under the authority of our teachers, and employed under the authority of our companies.  We are taught that it is ok for the members of higher social classes to take authority over the members of lower social classes, who are taught to be service of those who have more money.  We receive our information from the authority of experts and we are discouraged from trusting ourselves, or our neighbors; instead we are encouraged to trust the authority of external sources.

Many young adults aspire to becoming authority figures who represent the military, the criminal justice system, law enforcement, or political parties, because they are intoxicated by the romance of helping others for "the greater good".  They know the system is corrupted, but they believe that, by joining the system, they can help fix the inherent corruption, somehow.  Those poor fools will learn the lesson that many before them have learned: you can't fix the system from within.  You can't fix the system at all when it's broken by design.  Are there any Ayn Rand fans reading this? (crickets)  I would recommend looking up some of her quotes about altruism, and why it isn't beneficial to society.

Doing something for the greater good can only be accomplished by taking authority over others.  There is a great example of this in the movie The Dark Knight, when the joker plays a game with two cruise ships that are full of people.  Each ship has the option to push a button that will blow up the other ship and kill everyone aboard.  If neither ship decides to push that button, then both ships will explode and they will all die.  In a world of subjective morality, this is a very suspenseful situation to be in, because nobody knows what will happen.  In a world of objective morality, there would be no suspense because everyone knows that both ships are going to explode.  That's why it is objective morality.

We are so indoctrinated that even our beliefs about love have become inverted and opposed to the true God.  If you truly love someone then you should let them be free, but here we are taught that true love means holding authority over the person we love.  Cheating in a relationship is something that we are taught is wrong because it is a violation of the contract that was agreed upon: to allow our partners to hold authority over us, until the day we die.

I want to make sure that I am thoroughly explaining these concepts because they are difficult to grasp, which obviously is what was intended by the creators of this world, which imprisons is.  The reason we are suffering is because it is wrong to take authority over others... but that doesn't mean that it is only wrong to take authority over others when it causes suffering.  This inverted world has also inverted the concept of being a good person, by employing the archetype of "the hero".  The hero in every story is synonymous with the good guy and protagonist, who saves the people from the villain.  Often times, in stories, the villain is taking authority over the damsel in distress, but it is imperative to understand that the hero is also taking authority over the damsel in distress, by saving her.  When we view the situation through the eyes of objective morality, we can see that it is wrong to save others.  I suppose, then, that I shouldn't be surprised, when every new movie that comes out is a garbage Marvel superhero story about how taking authority over others is always the right thing to do.  I knew there had to be a good reason why I hate white knighting so much... fucking simps.